PLANET Teleconference (November 1978 - February 1979)
Page 4: PLANET messages numbered
between 970 and 1128
previous page
Table of Contents
Gillette
[970]
In regard to Brendan's trinity of modes (with its implicit critique of certain Wittgensteinian techniques)--a re-working of standard "living" descriptive vocabularies (aesthetic, scientific, mystical, logico-mathematic, etc.) can do more for a fresh comprehension of the "curious impending overall synthesis." This is in the core of the matter. The exchange activity itself is either an activity resistant to definition or an activity extremely tolerant of definition, absorbing and transferring these into its own substance. The specter of failing at maintaining this inverse and paradoxical harmony of resistance to definition and wild tolerance of definition is in a line from Wallace Stevens: "Sentimentality is a failure of feeling."
As for Brendan's "delicious
infection"--I would (driven as it drives me) draw on, in full flush
of reference, my very last Kierkegaard: "The individual becomes conscious
of himself as being this particular individual with particular gifts, tendencies,
impulses, passions, under the influence of a particular environment, as
a particular product of his milieu. He who becomes thus conscious of himself
assumes all this as part of his own responsibility. At the moment of choice
he is thus in complete isolation, for he withdraws from his surroundings;
and yet he is in complete continuity, for he chooses himself as product;
and this choice is a free choice, so that we might even say, when he chooses
himself as product, he is producing himself."
I submit the following as entries in the glossary for this exchange. The connections between these words stem from intuitive contagion, and not necessarily a strict adherence to formal definition. They are essentials (in the cybernetic sense) as transferable to cybernautic activity.
message: composed of various ratios of
information and noise.
feedback: positive, in order to expand deviation in a given system
performance, and negative in order to restrict deviation or maintain a
steady state.
homeostasis
redundancy
"redundancy of potential command"
continuous and discrete
euphony
cacophony
fecundity
chaos
incoherence/triviality
proto-responsibility
O'Regan
[976]
Gloss on glossary: I think we should derive the terms from further down the line. Maybe the day will come when the fecundity of my cacophony will lead away from chaos and incoherence/triviality and toward the great goddess of proto-responsibility.
Gillette
[978]Re: Brendan on 940
--As to the appropriateness of "paradox" and "inversion" (from as classic a source as the Bible no less) is the correlation between two distinct remarks. Genesis: ". . .In the beginning was the word." and the apostle John: ". . .and the word was made flesh." This is the stuff of paradox and inversion, especially when you consider the ration of letters in most alphabets (22-26) and the chromosome ration in genes (21-26). This may be an extreme range and may include fictional documentation, but it is appropriate enough.
O'Regan
[981]
On language/inversion/paradox: in the Hawaiian vocabulary there are 33 different ways to indicate a cloud, 179 terms about sweet potato alone, 225 words about the taro plant from which poi is made!
[991]
Issue alert! Message 1000 is approaching, a first time with me on this system.
Gillette
[1000]
This is the millenium message, in pursuit of the millenial, poised with dispatch and referential clarity to resist all attenuation of mystery resulting from the shibbolith of our epoch: the drive toward the cosmic "quick fix."
Energy is eternal delight
O'Regan
[1001]
As 1001, I am glad the computer does count beyond 999. We never went this high on any conference before. Thus we didn't know what it was programmed to actually do: play Beethoven, a Mexican Samba, or an Irish jig.
[1005]
I'm here in Honolulu with Jim Dator, head of the Alternative Futures Project at the University of Hawaii. Jim is involved with many computer networks and is presently organizing a conference on science, technology and the future in Berlin. Jim wants to pose the following questions: Is science only a Western mode of knowledge? How does science as an activity change in response to new cultural pressures? What work is being done to articulate new needs and modes of inquiry in the sciences?
[1128]
On a more sinister level, the security of the entire world now rests on the controls of the just such systems, and isn't it time we explored the outer limits of this for its impact effect on communication? Such systems are integral to all security systems at the military level, and even this terminal you are all using has more sophistication than I think some of you realize, e.g., for manipulating more complex programs in larger computers ranging in use from banking to missiles.